I have struggled with the meaning of this emotionally charged word that has come to represent a certain category of persons who have come under fire and threat these days. Here is the Miriam Webster definition:
“aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)”
Current political usage of “woke” is as a negative term implying advocacy for groups such as the racially marginalized as well as LGBTQIA+ persons. It at times is also invoked to attack those favoring environmentally friendly policies. The implication is that any supporting of so-called “woke” policies is anti-American and un-Christian.
Although not exactly the same, there is some overlap between “woke” and support of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Our government has undertaken actions to eliminate DEI policies from government agencies and has begun attacks on educational institutions supporting DEI topics and policies.
I recently watched a video of Fred Rogers testifying in a congressional hearing regarding PBS funding, something else that is currently being attacked because of being too “woke”. Here is a typical quote from Mr. Rogers:
“As human beings, our job in life is to help people realize how rare and valuable each one of us really is, that each of us has something that no one else has or ever will have something inside that is unique to all time. It’s our job to encourage each other to discover that uniqueness and to provide ways of developing its expression.”
“Good grief”, I thought. “That sounds like being ‘woke’!” And indeed it would appear that, with his acceptance of every child “just the way you are” as well as his own gentle challenges to issues such as racism (Remember the episode where he bathed his feet with his African American policeman?) would appear to label him as “woke”.
Then I looked through my blog. Over the years, I have written about some extraordinary people who have truly blessed my spiritual journey. Nowadays I believe they all would be called “woke” and perhaps attacked. Here are a few.
Clearly Dorothy Day and Daniel Berrigan would be called “woke”, Dorothy Day for her advocacy on behalf of the poor no matter what their race and Daniel Berrigan for his protests against a government sponsored war. Similarly the great folk singer Pete Seeger was marginalized during the era of McCarthyism ( a time which has some eerie parallels to these current times). His many songs spoke out against racism, war, and the general marginalizing of minorities.
The great Jewish scholar Abraham Joshua Heschel marched with Martin Luther King. Vietnamese Buddhist and teacher Thich Nhat Hahn spoke out against war and discrimination. Thomas Merton was vocal in favor of civil rights. Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright August Wilson enriched our understanding of the challenges to African-Americans. Even Vincent Van Gogh through some of his paintings captured the sufferings of poor farmers and other laborers. All would likely be labelled as “woke”.
Larry Doby and Jackie Robinson, through their integration of Major League Baseball, actively undid decades-old discrimination in a major business. Where they not attempting to establish DEI in baseball? Would that not qualify them both as “woke”?(If this seems far-fetched, keep in mind that Jackie Robinson’s autobiography was earmarked for removal at the Naval Academy as part of a government program to remove literature supporting DEI).
The late Pope Francis would appear to qualify as “woke”. Even the likes of great saints such as Oscar Romero would appear to be “woke” because of his advocacy for politically oppressed groups in San Salvador. And, yes, it even seems likely that Jesus Christ, He who spoke for the poor and the rejected, He who challenged the power brokers, He who came to wake us up, would qualify as “woke”.
As noted above, there are eerie similarities these days with the Red Scare of the 1950s. At that time, books were removed from libraries. People lost jobs. Schools were pressured to not include any information that could be interpreted as “red”. Given that Donald Trump has a direct line to Sen. Joe McCarthy through Roy Cohn, the parallel is not improbable.
The issues of today that fall under the category of “woke” are not simple issues. What is missing is intelligent dialogue. Our country has become polarized. Some of our religions are headed in the same direction. Intelligent dialogue balanced by accountability is missing in the public discourse.
As I read over my list of spiritual influences that would likely be labelled as “woke”, it saddened me. Do I agree with everything they said or did? No. But their challenges have made me think, made me reflect on what I believe. This, I think, is part of what spiritual growth entails — a spirit of open-mindedness.
I am grateful for everyone on my list as well as other spiritual influences. I guess that means I’m “woke”.
Feel free to pass this on. Feel free to comment. Intelligent dialogue points the way.

Thank you Rich for always being open to others’ thoughts. May I react randomly here to your post.
Regarding the word “woke”, I believe it is like many other words these days where the meaning changes depending on fluid cultural ebbs and flows.
If “woke” means being open and considerate of people who look different than me, think differently than me, and have different political and spiritual beliefs than I do . . . then I am for it.
If it means shutting down, silencing all truth seekers, and cancel culture anyone who dares to disagree, then I am against it.
If it means to allows others to speak without shouting them down or insulting them because they are not considered “marginalized”, for example and heaven forbid a white male, . . . then I am against it.
Regarding DEI, if it means allowing anyone with the qualifications to have equal opportunities to work and pay, then I am for it. If it means giving preferential treatment to anyone based on their gender, race or sexual identity even though they are not qualified for the position, then I am against it.
Regarding funding cuts, if it means removing fraud, waste, and lewd and crude content from children’s TV and school books, then I am for it. Having worked in corporate America for so long, budget cuts are cyclical and the norm and unfortunately sometimes there are collateral damage where something gets cut that shouldn’t have been. As is usually the case, these get added back in when future funding allows.
Regarding the current administration, I hope and pray they are not the evil empire that the media is portraying them out to be. Since we are all being deceived, it’s hard to be sure what is actually going on but I believe it is not a witch hunt or McCarthyism or Nazi cleansing, or whatever other fear mongering words the media is pushing. I believe it is a long overdue recalibration that is going to hurt all of us before it gets better. Medicine can be like that.
Thanks again for providing a safe place to share.
Grace and Peace,
Your friend, Michele
I found this definition of “woke” using Artificial Intelligence. I believe that Jesus could be described as “woke” using the original meaning.
1. Original Meaning (Positive/Social Justice Context)
Historically, “woke” originated in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and meant being alert to social injustice, particularly issues of racism and inequality. To “stay woke” meant to stay aware of systemic injustices and not be lulled into complacency.
2. Contemporary Use (Broader and Politicized)
In more recent years, “woke” has been adopted—and often criticized—by some as a pejorative term. In this context, it’s used to describe people or ideas seen as excessively politically correct, overly progressive, or performative in their social justice efforts.
Examples:
Neutral/Positive: “She’s woke to the struggles of marginalized communities.”
Negative/Ironic: “That company’s new ad campaign is so woke—it’s all just virtue signaling.”
3. Cultural and Political Weaponization
In political and media discourse, especially in the U.S. and U.K., “woke” has been used as a catch-all insult by critics to dismiss progressive stances on race, gender, climate change, or inclusion as extreme or out of touch.